🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."