🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the baseball championship didn't occur during the tense final game last Saturday, when her squad executed multiple dramatic comeback act after another and then prevailing in extra innings against the Toronto Blue Jays.

It came in the previous game, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, executed a thrilling, decisive sequence that at the same time challenged many negative misconceptions promoted about Latinos in recent years.

The play in itself was stunning: Hernández charged in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially lost in the bright lights, then threw it to the infield to secure another, decisive play. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a runner collided with him, knocking him backwards.

This wasn't merely a remarkable sporting achievement, perhaps the decisive shift in the series in the team's favor after appearing for most of the games like the weaker side. To her, it was thrilling, politically and culturally, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, security forces monitoring the neighborhoods, and a steady stream of negativity from national leaders.

"The players presented this counter-narrative," explained the professor. "The world witnessed Latinos showing an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as key figures on the team, having a distinct kind of masculinity. They are energetic, they're yelling, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and chased down. It is so simple to be disheartened these days."

However, it's entirely straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for her or for the many of other Latinos who attend regularly to matches and occupy as many as half of the venue's 50,000 seats per game.

A Complicated Relationship with the Organization

After aggressive enforcement operations started in the city in June, and military troops were sent into the area to respond to resulting protests, two of the local soccer teams quickly released messages of solidarity with affected communities – but not the baseball team.

The team president stated the Dodgers want to steer clear of politics – a stance influenced, perhaps, by the reality that a sizable portion of the fans, including Latinos, are followers of certain leaders. Under considerable external demands, the organization subsequently pledged $one million in aid for individuals directly impacted by the operations but made no official criticism of the government.

Official Event and Historical Heritage

Months earlier, the organization did not hesitate in accepting an invitation to mark their previous championship victory at the official residence – a move that sports writers labeled as "pathetic … weak … and hypocritical", considering the Dodgers' pride in having been the first major league team to end the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that history and the values it embodies by executives and present and past athletes. A number of players such as the coach had voiced unwillingness to go to the White House during the first term but then changed their minds or gave in to pressure from team management.

Corporate Control and Supporter Conflicts

An additional issue for supporters is that the Dodgers are owned by a corporate behemoth, the ownership group, whose investments, as per sources and its own published financial documents, involve a stake in a detention company that operates enforcement centers. Guggenheim's executives has stated repeatedly that it aims to stay out of politics, but its critics say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own form of compliance to current policies.

All of that contribute to significant conflicted emotions among Hispanic supporters in especial – sentiments that surfaced even in the euphoria of this season's hard-won championship triumph and the following outpouring of team support across the city.

"Is it okay to support the Dodgers?" area writer one observer agonized at the start of the postseason in an elegant article pondering on "Dodger blue in our blood, but doubt in our minds". Galindo was unable to ultimately bring himself to view the championship, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he decided his personal protest must have given the squad the luck it needed to succeed.

Distinguishing the Players from the Management

Many supporters who share similar misgivings appear to have decided that they can continue to back the players and its roster of global players, featuring the Asian megastar a key player, while pouring scorn on the team's business overlords. Nowhere was this more evident than at the championship parade at the home venue on Monday, when the packed audience roared in support of the coach and his athletes but booed the team president and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"These men in formal attire do not get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Past Context and Community Effect

The problem, however, goes further than just the team's current owners. The deal that moved the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s required the city razing three working-class Hispanic communities on a elevated area overlooking downtown and then selling the land to the organization for a fraction of its market value. A song on a 2005 album that chronicles the events has an low-income parking attendant at the venue revealing that the home he forfeited to eviction is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, possibly the region's most influential Mexican American writer and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional relationship between the franchise and its audience. He calls the team the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its supporters for decades.

"They have acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other for so long because they have been able to get away with it," Arellano wrote over the summer, when demands to boycott the organization over its lack of response to the enforcement actions were contradicted by the uncomfortable fact that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the height of the protests when downtown LA was under to a evening curfew.

International Stars and Community Connections

Separating the squad from its corporate owners is not a simple task, {